|
Towns are highlighted on the landscape by Pont, often with the added notation of their names being inscribed in capital letters. Nairn, Forres, Fraserburgh, Renfrew and Biggar, for example, stand out from the surrounding countryside.
That many of these small towns were still basically of the medieval pattern
- a single street settlement - can be seen clearly on a number
of the manuscripts. Forfar, Biggar, Rutherglen and Lanark, for
example, are all depicted as having one major street.Glasgow,
however, already showing signs of growing economic importance,
had developed a cruciform street pattern; and Dundee exhibited
the complex lay-out of a long-established burgh (a town with specific
legal privileges) of considerable wealth and trading influence.
Closely associated with this street pattern were the burgage
plots, or tofts. These were the portions of land which the burgesses
were allocated. Here, they built their dwellings, sank their wells,
dug their midden pits, reared animals and grew vegetables, and
housed their workshops. The tofts can be studied on Pont's maps.
Paisley, Rutherglen, Hawick, Forfar and Dumfries, for example,
display the classic herringbone pattern of burgage plots running
back from the main street frontage.
Towns set themselves apart from the countryside by built features;
one of the most important, psychologically, being the demarcation
of the town limits. Stirling was one of the few Scottish towns
to be stone-walled. This Pont depicts clearly and boldly with
a double line, a device he uses on his first draft of Perth, another
rare stone-walled town. Sanquhar, a town enclosed by only the
traditional ditch and wooden palisade is illustrated equally precisely
with merely a single encircling line. Tain and Dornoch are likewise
set apart from the surrounding countryside, suggesting that they
were physically delineated by only a ditch and/or small wooden
palisade.
Entrance to the town was through the town gates, or ports. Elgin's
ports are delineated accurately and show that they were constructed
in the form of an arch. The same is true of Lanark, Hamilton,
Dumfries, Glasgow and Hawick. Late sixteenth-century documents
give no details of the exact construction of town ports. It is,
therefore, interesting to wonder whether Stirling's Barras-Yett,
known to have been a massive structure, was, in fact, a double
archway, as Pont's delineation seems to suggest.
Pont was acutely aware of the physical dominance of the market
place and its associated buildings. The spaces, where booths and
stalls were set up, may be seen clearly on his views, for example,
of Lanark, Biggar, Rutherglen and Dumfries. Perhaps more precise,
although less frequent, are his interpretations of market crosses,
as may be noted in Glasgow and Dumfries, marked very clearly,
with the symbol of a cross. Most burghs had tolbooths. These functioned
as the collection point for market tolls, as the repository of
the market weights, as the town jail and as the home of the burgh
council. That of Dumfries is shown close by the market cross and
the view of Glasgow from the south delineates clearly its tolbooth.
Nairn's tolbooth features prominently on the townscape, as befitted
a building which also functioned as the meeting place for the
sheriff court.
It was, perhaps, inevitable that Pont, as the son of a minister,
would see parish churches as an integral part of the urban scene.
Nairn's St. Ninian's Church and Perth's St. John's Church, for
example, are drawn with great clarity, as is the parish church
of Dundee, dedicated to St. Mary. The sheer dominance of the latter
on the townscape confirms the impressiveness of the old medieval
church.
Pont's depictions of towns at the turn of the sixteenth and
seventeenth centuries are essential primary sources for any study
of the urban history of the period. They offer a unique insight
into Scotland at a specific moment in time.
|